The LEGS Project is an independent initiative that aims to improve the quality and livelihoods impact of livestock-related projects in humanitarian situations.
The key activity of the LEGS Project is the production and dissemination of the LEGS Handbook, supported by a global training programme and other awareness raising activities.
At a Nairobi workshop in 2004, which brought together humanitarian agencies working on livestock programmes in the region. Practitioners raised concerns about the quality of livestock responses in emergencies. The livelihoods of livestock-owning communities were often not taken into account by such interventions and in some cases livelihoods were undermined by the emergency response. Workshop participants highlighted the need for a common reference point to guide better quality programmes and Tufts University took the lead to identify funding and bring together interested parties. In 2006 the first LEGS Steering Group meeting took place in Addis Ababa and the LEGS Project was officially launched.
The ultimate aim of LEGS is to ‘improve the quality and livelihoods impact of livestock-related projects in humanitarian crises’, while the goal is that ‘LEGS guidelines and support services are used globally to ensure high standards of livestock-based emergency response, with benefits to both people and animals’.
To work towards this goal, the LEGS Project has identified two impact areas:
The LEGS Project monitors progress against the first impact area directly, while the second impact area is measured indirectly through reports and impact assessments of practitioner organisations.
The new LEGS Project Strategy for 2016-2020 is based on four output areas:
A summary of the strategy is available for download here.
In 2011, LEGS was accepted as a formal companion standard to the Sphere Project’s Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards for Humanitarian Response, and together with Sphere is part of an informal alliance of humanitarian standards including other companion standards: the Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE) – Minimum Standards for Education: Preparedness, Response, Recovery; the Small Enterprise Education and Promotion (SEEP) Network’s Minimum Economic Recovery Standards (MERS), and the Child Protection Working Group’s Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (CPMS).
The LEGS Training Programme is based on training of trainers (TOT) courses to build national and local capacity in developing regions of the world. The graduates of each TOT (‘LEGS Trainers’) are equipped with the skills, materials and methodologies to run the standard 3-day LEGS training course, which aims to bring the LEGS Handbook to life and enable practitioners to implement the LEGS approach in the field.
LEGS Trainers deliver the 3-day training course independently of the LEGS Project, in response to demand in their home countries, from within their organization, or from other interested parties. To date the LEGS Project has trained over 340 LEGS Trainers from around the world through 19 TOTs in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. Between them they have run more than 180 LEGS training courses independently of LEGS Project funding.
In addition to the TOTs, the LEGS Project carries out half-day awareness sessions for donors and decision makers. Contact the LEGS Coordinator for more details.
For more information on the LEGS Training Programme
The LEGS Project organises LEGS Training of Trainers (TOTs) but does not organise the 3-day LEGS training courses. Instead we leave interested organisations to commission LEGS Training from any of the LEGS Trainers in their country or region. Only LEGS Trainers (who have successfully completed a LEGS TOT) are authorised to deliver the 3-day LEGS Training – see the LEGS Training Policy for more details.
There are currently over 340 LEGS Trainers from 81 countries around the world and their contact details can be obtained from the LEGS Administrator. LEGS Trainers who have successfully carried out two LEGS Training Courses after graduating from a TOT become ‘accredited’ Trainers and are listed here
For more information on how to organise LEGS Training
The LEGS Project organises the 6-day LEGS TOTs. If you are interested in hosting or funding a LEGS TOT in your country or region please contact the LEGS Coordinator.
The LEGS Project is not operational and hence does not intervene directly in emergencies. We are able to connect interested people and agencies with LEGS Trainers in a particular country and to share information on the LEGS approach.
No, the LEGS Project does not have any funds to disperse.
The LEGS Handbook contains:
The 2nd edition of the LEGS Handbook is available in English, French, Arabic and Spanish. The 1st edition is also available in Thai and Vietnamese.
The LEGS Handbook 2nd edition is available in hard copy in English and Spanish (forthcoming January 2016); and in pdf format for free download from the website in: English, French, Arabic and Spanish. The 1st edition is also available in Thai and Vietnamese.
The pdf versions are available here
Hard copies can be ordered direct from the publisher
The LEGS approach focuses on supporting the livelihoods of livestock keepers before, during and following a crisis. It is therefore based on three objectives affecting livelihoods in crisis-affected communities:
Objective 1: to provide immediate benefits using existing livestock resources
Objective 2: to protect key livestock assets
Objective 3: to rebuild key livestock assets
LEGS guides practitioners through four key stages of response planning and implementation:
Stage 1: initial assessment
Stage 2: response identification
Stage 3: analysis of technical interventions and options
Stage 4: monitoring and evaluation
At each stage there are participatory tools to help the user to work through the stage, including the Participatory Response Identification Matrix (PRIM), which is used to facilitate discussion and planning among stakeholders including beneficiary representatives to determine the most appropriate, timely and feasible options to support livestock keepers in any particular crisis.
LEGS discusses the key issues (including cross-cutting themes such as gender and protection) for each possible technical intervention and provides a review of the advantages and disadvantages of various sub-options and a decision tree to highlight key questions that need to be addressed. These are followed by specific standards, key actions and guidance notes for each intervention and option.
The LEGS website resources section includes some of the references from the bibliography section of the LEGS Handbook (presented according to technical intervention area), as well as a number of LEGS-specific resources including:
LEGS is funded from multiple sources as a means to increase awareness and use of LEGS. The LEGS Project has received funding and in-kind support* from the following organisations:
The LEGS Coordinator and the LEGS Administrator are currently based in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, with other members of the team based in the UK, Switzerland, Spain, Thailand and New Zealand. See ‘What organisation manages LEGS?’ for more information.
The LEGS Project is overseen by an international Steering Group, which provides strategic direction of the project and quality control of LEGS products and the training programme. Details of the current LEGS Steering Group members are available here
LEGS Project activities are managed on a day-to-day basis by a small team at Vetwork UK comprising the LEGS Coordinator, Training Coordinator, support staff and consultants, with technical support from Tufts University.
See the discussion paper: LEGS and Resilience: Linking Livestock, Livelihoods and Drought Management in the Horn of Africa
LEGS is based on humanitarian principles and law, hence its starting point is the welfare of people. In contrast, the main objective of animal welfare organizations in disasters is to improve or protect animal welfare, although some of these organizations also recognize how improved animal welfare could provide economic or other benefits to people.
However, although LEGS aims to improve or protect the livelihoods of people affected by disasters, it is also recognised that many of the activities recommended by LEGS have animal welfare benefits. Therefore, each of the technical chapters of LEGS outlines how the LEGS interventions relate to animal welfare and the “five freedoms” commonly used as a framework for assessing animal welfare:
See also the LEGS Briefing Paper on Animal Welfare
With the increasing use of cash transfers in humanitarian programmes, the use of cash-based responses constitutes an option for achieving the LEGS objectives. Table 3.5 in chapter 3 of the LEGS Handbook summarises the most common types of cash transfer and Table 3.6 provides examples of how they can be used. Further information is given in each technical chapter. Detailed guides on market assessment and cash response mechanisms are listed in the References section of Chapter 3.
A paper on livestock responses and cash transfers is also available in the resources section of the LEGS website
Gender and social equity is one of the four cross-cutting themes presented in Chapter 2 of the LEGS Handbook. The chapter highlights the importance of understanding roles, rights and responsibilities and the differential impact of crises on different groups of people; making sure information collected is disaggregated by gender; and understanding vulnerability and equity. Further guidance is provided in the specific technical chapters.
Environment and climate is one of the four cross-cutting themes presented in Chapter 2 of the LEGS Handbook. The chapter recognises current climate trends and their differential impact in different parts of the world, and highlights the importance for agencies involved in disaster risk reduction among livestock keepers to keep abreast of developments and future trends in this area. Further guidance is provided in the specific technical chapters.
LEGS is based on a livelihoods approach and draws on a comprehensive review of evaluations that shows how certain types of livestock-related assistance can provide financial or nutritional benefits to people affected by disasters. Given this humanitarian and livelihoods perspectives of LEGS, companion animals are not explicitly mentioned in the Handbook although it is recognised that these animals provide important social benefits for their owners. Many of the LEGS Standards and Guidance Notes apply to companion animals, and specific guidance is available from the Animal Welfare Information Center at the United States Department of Agriculture (AWIC)
LEGS originated from a workshop in East Africa that reviewed experiences from livestock projects in complex emergencies or droughts in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan and Sudan. In the case of complex emergencies, these were long-term disasters affecting many millions of people over many years. In the case of droughts, again these affected millions of people – often across two or more countries – and were recurrent. For both types of disaster, there had been substantial funding from the main humanitatian aid donors, and large-scale responses coordinated by governments or the UN. As LEGS started to take shape from 2005, initial discussions with agencies such as FAO, ICRC, Oxfam GB and VSF re-affirmed the need for LEGS to cover major humanitarian crises where many people were dependent on livestock. In general, developing countries rather than industrialized countries are a greater risk of humanitarian disasters, and disasters where substantial numbers of people are affected. Similarly, the term “humanitarian diaster” is partly defined by the capacity of local people and governments to respond. Such capacity is more likely to be insufficient in developing countries, which tend not to have the emergency planning and response capabilities, or national insurance schemes for disasters.
Furthermore, in high-income countries, some priorities for emergency response may differ from the priorities for poorer livestock keepers in low-income countries. For example, in high-income countries, issues relating to insurance or companion animals may be prioritised, but since LEGS does not focus on these issues the LEGS Standards and guidelines may therefore be less appropriate. However, key principles of the LEGS approach, including the importance of consultation and participation, building on existing local knowledge, and supporting livelihoods, are relevant to any livestock-based response to an emergency. Some practitioners have found the LEGS approach useful in disaster responses in high-income countries.